Diego Sebastian Schwartzman vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L W L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Schwartzman 1 - 1 Broady
They have played 9 sets in total, with Schwartzman winning 5 and Broady winning 4. The last match between Schwartzman and Broady was at the Wimbledon - London, 30-06-2022, Second, Grass with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-2 4-6 0-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diego Sebastian Schwartzman | 1 |
| Liam Broady | 1 |
Wimbledon - London(30-06-2022)
6
2
4
6
0
6
7
6
6
1
| Schwartzman | Stats | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (18-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 442 | Ranking | 631 |
| 8 | Highest Rank | 93 |
| 32 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 20 | Titles | 10 |
| 60% (579-386) | Career Total W/L | 58% (493-363) |
| $9,448,195 | Career Prize Money | $1,004,050 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schwartzman VS Broady H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 0-6 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
70%
(
112 of
159)
1st Serve %
61%
(
84 of
137)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
84)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
65 of
159)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
51 of
137)
145
Total Points Won
151
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Liam Broady
61%
(
80 of
132)
1st Serve %
67%
(
79 of
118)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
135
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
Schwartzman VS Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 43 | Games Won | 36 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 3:30:30 | Average Match Time | 3:30:30 |
| 61% (164/269) | 1st Serve % | 69% (191/277) |
| 66% (108/164) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (117/191) |
| 56% (59/105) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (41/86) |
| 46% (13/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (8/32) |
| 43% (119/277) | Return Points Win % | 38% (102/269) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Nicolas Jarry
67%
(
76 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(10) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
54%
(
65 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
136
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Vilius Gaubas
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
15
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
133)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
58 of
94)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
123
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Lukas Neumayer
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Liam Broady
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Francesco Forti
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Iannis Miletich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Filippo Romano
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Lucas Bouquet
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
56 of
72)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Jacopo Antonelli
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (579/386) | Win/Loss | 58% (493/363) |
| 58% (1362/988) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1118/869) |
| 53% (11706/10260) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9856/8886) |
| 52% (110/102) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (259/157) |
| 65% (429/234) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (75/61) |
| 48% (30/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (127/88) |
| 37% (10/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (32/57) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1352 | Aces Total | 2339 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2196 | Total Double Faults | 1498 |
| 1:23:5 | Average Match Time | 1:13:6 |
| 462.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 502.82 |
| 64% (35558/55981) | 1st Serve % | 63% (28429/45284) |
| 65% (23012/35558) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (19324/28429) |
| 50% (10189/20416) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8751/16848) |
| 45% (2947/6575) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1874/4390) |
| 43% (24537/57156) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17687/44698) |
| 61% (71/45) | Slam W/L | 47% (26/29) |
| 51% (72/69) | Masters W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 42% (11/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (140/119) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (40/47) |
| 0% (0/3) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (151/79) | Challenger W/L | 56% (226/180) |
| 71% (132/55) | Futures W/L | 66% (190/98) |
| 60% (515/857) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (483/829) |
| 59% (61/103) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 53% (150/281) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (133/260) |
| 55% (157/283) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (136/261) |
| 88% (550/483) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (484/419) |
| 12% (550/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (484/64) |
| 23% (415/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (370/74) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
